User Tools

Site Tools


ais

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ais [2024/06/29 19:20] – [A Different Interpretation] kenais [2024/12/17 17:11] (current) ken
Line 34: Line 34:
 They may not have been the only ones.  They may not have been the only ones. 
 Enoch is not called a man, but is only referred to within the ancestors of the 'adem' Enoch is not called a man, but is only referred to within the ancestors of the 'adem'
-Likewise, Abraham is introduced within the ancestors of Shem without specifying a gender.+Likewise, Abraham is introduced within the ancestors of Shem without specifying a [[gender]].
  
 These characters are explicitly stated as "adem", in so far as they are **human** descendants of the human character named Adem.  These characters are explicitly stated as "adem", in so far as they are **human** descendants of the human character named Adem. 
ais.1719710451.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/06/29 19:20 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki