Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- alehim [2024/04/06 17:20] – ken
+++ alehim [2025/03/02 13:31] (current) – [The Tree People] ken
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 The word 'alehim' is made by adding the suffix '[[im]]' onto the root word '[[aleh]]'. The word is in general usage under the pronunciation of "elohim".
-The suffix [[im]] always indicates a plural, and therefore a group. In a handful of cases the "grouping" itself is the salient feature and the word ending in 'im' is in fact a numerative device, either a specific number, or a general amount (for example "dozens"). Aside from these distinctly numeric cases, the suffix is generally applied to not merely a group of any random objects, but a group of living beings. These beings are sometimes animals and sometimes humans.
+The suffix [[im]] always indicates a plural, and therefore a group, but the suffix is generally applied to not merely a group of any random objects, but a group of living beings, usually people.
-In the case of humans, we see the root appearing on words indicating a certain profession or specific skill. It also appears in instances indicating what we might think of as "race" or "nationality", normally indicating where this group of people are from and by extension what culture they are part of.
+As discussed further [[im|here]], the root appearing on words indicating a certain profession or specific skill. It also appears in instances indicating what we might think of as "race" or "nationality", normally indicating where this group of people are from and by extension what culture they are part of.
-Even in the case of animals, the plurality indicated by 'im' tends to be in reference to some behavioral characteristic of said animals. For example, deer are referred to as "panting for the water" and goats are referred to for their characteristic surefootedness on the mountain cliffs. These characteristics seem to indicate some level of well-suitedness or perhaps it could be argued, some specific type of applied intelligence.
 Thus like most words with the suffix, 'im', the Elohim are most assuredly a group, and most likely a group of entities having a form of intelligence. The 'im' suffix brings with it an implication of a certain specific culture, skills, and origin.
 ====The Tree People====
-Though its implications are complex and a bit beyond the originally intended scope of this project. The word [[aleh]] appears to be best interpreted as referring to a type of hardwood tree. Given that [[aleh]] is unquestionably the correct root word for 'alehim', we cannot avoid the conclusion that the 'alehim' are literally "the Tree People".
+The root word [[aleh]] appears to be best interpreted as referring to tree - specifically a type of hardwood tree. Alehim is in fact [[cognate]] with the English "Elm"
+Given that [[aleh]] is unquestionably the correct root word for 'alehim', we cannot avoid the conclusion that the a most literal translation of 'alehim' yields "the Tree People". Since [[yex]] also means "tree", [[yexim]] also means "tree people" and therefore it seems that [[yexim]] appears to be a synonym or simply another name for the Alehim.
+A fairly straightforward interpretation of this translation is that the alehim are associated with trees because they lived in an area with many trees. In other words, the alehim are "the Forest People". This might imply certain facts about the lifestyle and culture of the alehim from an anthropological perspective. People living in a forest are likely to utilize hunting and gathering as food collection methods rather than herding. However, forests do not necessarily preclude agriculture. Cultural precedence exists in archaeology for several examples of intentional agricultural activity within forest and jungle regions. In fact, it has been suggested that the Amazon rainforest itself is an artifact of ancient intentional plantation and harvesting techniques.
+===The Trees===
+Yet, the simple anthrolopological interpretation may not adequately explain the textual evidence.
+There appears within the texts several instances where characters appear to identify themselves //as// trees, rather than simply //living near// trees.
+This rather unusual phenomena relates to [[Ihoh]] himself, and also to the [[Semim]]. Interestingly, it is a motif that also appears in the ancient legends of several other cultures. Bizzarely, there seems to be some kind of connection between "the gods" and trees.
+Lev 18:2 Ihoh calls himself a tree
+Ihoh, the Alehim, and "trees" are correlated in 2 Chronicles36:13, Ezra 6:22, Psalm 48:8, Psalm 59:5, Psalm 84:8, Hosea 13:4.
+deuteronomy7:22 - _ Ihoh (tree) with nation to edge _ _ not _ finished _ before flourish on life in the hills
+_chronicles21:17 - spoke David to the Elohim not I spoke _ person I he who sin _ _ tree flock what establish Ihoh (tree) are now hand household person not _
+_chronicles22:7 - spoke David Solomon son I are with heart build household characteristics Ihoh (tree)
+FIXM analyze several more occurrences in the same chapter 1Chron22
-FIXME interpretations and implications
-Alehim is in fact cognate with the English "Elm"
-Alehim may refer to the [[teshim]]
 ====To====
 It is not entirely impossible that the root word might actually be אל [[al]] which means "to", and with the [[im]] suffix applied we can see that the literal meaning of Elohim is "The To Ones".
@@ Line 27: / Line 50: @@
 Applying a more grammatical structure to this literal meaning, one may reasonably infer an interpretation of "The Ones Who Came **To** Here". This may be the only sensible way to interpret "the to ones".
-As far as where they may have come //from//, pure etymology will not yield many clues. Other contextual clues are abundant however, and will be integrated into our understanding of the Elohim, as our journey continues. Primarily though, in order to gain any real insight as to the characteristics of these "people" (using the term loosely), we must examine the structural relationships between the Elohim and other groups mentioned contemporarily and within the same context (groups such as the [[Shemim]]) as well as their relationship with the [[Aretz]](Earth) and certain significant events that frame and define these relationships.
+As far as where they may have come //from//, pure etymology will not yield many clues. Other contextual clues are abundant however, and will be integrated into our understanding of the Elohim, as our journey continues. Primarily though, in order to gain any real insight as to the characteristics of these "people" (using the term loosely), we must examine the structural relationships between the Elohim and other groups mentioned contemporarily and within the same context (groups such as the [[Semim]]) as well as their relationship with the [[Aretz]](Earth) and certain significant events that frame and define these relationships.
 Defining these relationships is a major theme of the scriptures, and is in fact the topic of the opening scene of the Bible. [[Genesis 1|Genesis 1:1]] seeks to define an initial definition, to be fleshed out later. And that initial definition reads as follows:
@@ Line 33: / Line 56: @@
 בּראשית בּרא אלהים את שמים את ארץ
-(Barashit bara Elohim et Shemim et Aretz)
+(Barashit bara Elohim et Semim et Aretz)
-//The established division([[barashit]]) divided([[bara]]) between The [[Elohim]] and The [[Shemim]] and [[Aretz]]//.
+//The established division([[berashit]]) divided([[bera]]) between The [[Elohim]] and The [[Semim]] and [[Aretz]]//.
-In this opening line of the Bible, the Elohim are defined in terms of their relationship with the [[Shemim]] and [[Aretz]], and the [[bera]](division) between them.
+In this opening line of the Bible, the Elohim are defined in terms of their relationship with the [[Semim]] and [[Aretz]], and the [[bera]](division) between them.
+Psalm 14:5 has an interesting reference to the Alehim's pure ancestry
 ----
 This page is part of a series - see [[im]] backlinks for a dynamic list
-LexID = 90410