User Tools

Site Tools


hebrew_spelling_inconsistencies

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
hebrew_spelling_inconsistencies [2023/12/22 13:43] – created kenhebrew_spelling_inconsistencies [2025/02/01 12:14] (current) – [Analysis of Examples] ken
Line 3: Line 3:
 This article relies heavily on points raised in the [[diacritics]] page, so it is recommended to read that first. This article relies heavily on points raised in the [[diacritics]] page, so it is recommended to read that first.
  
-Due wide spelling variances in any given word in ancient Hebrew, determining correct lexicography and etymologies can be difficult. As a result, there are many Hebrew words which have traditionally been split into multiple words. In some cases there appears to be contextual justification for differential semantics having been applied. In other cases, the spelling variance may have incorrectly led to an unjustified semantic split.+Due to wide spelling variances in any given word in ancient [[Hebrew]], determining correct lexicography and etymologies can be difficult. As a result, there are many Hebrew words which have traditionally been split into multiple words. In some cases there appears to be contextual justification for differential semantics having been applied. In other cases, the spelling variance may have incorrectly led to an unjustified semantic split.
  
 +====Analysis of Examples====
 +As this phenomenon affects a large number of words, only a small sampling will be examined as examples.
 +
 +===areb===
 +FIXME this is a good simple example including diacritics
 +===akel===
 +[[akel]] is unanimously translated as meaning "eat"
 +It is used 800 times in the Hebrew scriptures, but with an incredible 480 different spellings!
 +
 +Many of these spellings include a variety of [[affixes]] which as we have already determined show a statistically low correlation with their traditional ostensible meanings.
 +
 +Within the root word itself, according to the [[diacritics]] the first vowel is variously written as א אְ אֱ אֲ אָ אֹ running the range of sounds from long and short A, long and short E, and even a long O.
 +
 +The second vowel sound is indicated by diacritics on the כ, and includes כָ כַ כֵ כֹ, again running through a range of A, E, and O sounds.
 +
 +We are left with an acceptable range of pronunciations including ekel, ekeel, ekal, ekayl, ekol, eekel, eekeel, eekal, eekayl, eekol, akel, akeel, akal, akayl, and akol, all of which are supposed to mean "eat". This is a ridiculous proposal. It is absurd to imagine that any naturally occurring language would have fifteen different ways of pronouncing a simple bi-syllabic root.
 +===aqah===
 +[[aqah]] uses 416 different spellings for the 978 instances of this simple word meaning "took"
 +
 +FIXME do [[hanah]], [[pereket]], [[tsow]]
 +
 +In light of these examples, we can conclude with some confidence that the apparent pronunciation differences between two (apparently) "similar root words" does not imply that the roots are different. Conversely, we can be confidant that a root word is consistent in meaning regardless of any perceived pronunciation changes erroneously implied by interpreting diacritics as factors in pronunciation.
 +
 +This is an important point to consider when examining key words such as the following:
 +
 +===shem===
 +[[shem]]
 +
 +===el ===
 +[[el]]
 +
 +----
 +
 +see also [[transliterative_alphabet#ghost vowels]]
hebrew_spelling_inconsistencies.1703277828.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/12/22 13:43 by ken

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki